2D 5-Neighbor Cellular Automata

  • After @jo 's 1D cellular automaton, I've explored the 2d CA considering 4 neighbors and starting from one black cell in the center.

    My question: if there is a better way to implement the rules without using a lot of "if statements"?

    The rule is: The base 2 digits of the rule number determines the CA evolution. The last bit specifies the state of a cell if all neighbors are OFF and it too is OFF. The next to last bit specifies the state of a cell if all neighbors are OFF but the cell itself is ON. Then each earlier pair of bits specifies what should happen if progressively (Totalistic) more neighbors are black. So, bits 2^0 and 2^1 apply if none of the four neighbors are ON, bits 2^2 and 2^3 apply if one neighbor is ON, bits 2^4 and 2^5 apply if two neighbors are ON, bits 2^6 and 2^7 apply if three neighbors are ON and bits 2^8 and 2^9 apply if all four neighbors are ON. (http://oeis.org/wiki/Index_to_2D_5-Neighbor_Cellular_Automata)

    Thank you!

    2D 5-neighbor cellular automata with drawbot, by Juan Feng
    See "A New Kind of Science" by Stephen Wolfram (p.170 - 179)
    # square size
    cellSize = 10
    # odd numbers only 
    numCell = 55 
    if numCell % 2 == 0:
        numCell += 1
    canvas = numCell * cellSize
    size (canvas, canvas)
    # type the number: 0 - 1023
    rule = 462 
    ruleSet = bin(rule)[2:].zfill(10)
    print (ruleSet)
    # starting from one active black cell in the center
    grid = [[0 for x in range(numCell)]for y in range(numCell)]
    grid[int((numCell-1)/2)][int((numCell-1)/2)] = 1 
    # count neighbor numbers (considering Von Neumann neighbors)
    def nbs(grid, r, c):
        def get(r, c):
            if 0 <= r < len(grid) and 0 <= c < len(grid[r]):
                return grid[r][c]
                return 0
        neighbors_list = [get(r-1, c), get(r, c-1), get(r, c+1), get(r+1, c)]
        return sum(map(bool, neighbors_list))
    # step: 0 - inf
    step = 22    
    for i in range(step):
        newGrid = []
        for r,u in enumerate(grid): 
            for c,v in enumerate(u):
                if grid[r][c] == 0 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 0:
                if grid[r][c] == 1 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 0:
                if grid[r][c] == 0 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 1:
                if grid[r][c] == 1 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 1:
                if grid[r][c] == 0 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 2:
                if grid[r][c] == 1 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 2:
                if grid[r][c] == 0 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 3:
                if grid[r][c] == 1 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 3:
                if grid[r][c] == 0 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 4:
                if grid[r][c] == 1 and nbs(grid,r,c) == 4:
        grid = newGrid 
    # draw cells     
    yy = 0
    while yy * cellSize <= canvas - cellSize:
        xx = 0
        while xx * cellSize <= canvas - cellSize:
            if grid[xx][yy] == 1:
            rect(xx*cellSize, yy*cellSize, cellSize, cellSize)
            xx += 1
        yy += 1
    # saveImage('~/Desktop/2d_CA_test.png') 



  • hi juan, pretty nice!
    I hope somebody will post a more general and cleaner solution to this but one way would be remove all the ifs and calculate the ruleSet position:

    val = 9 - 2 * nbs(grid,r,c) - grid[r][c]

    This line:

    return sum(map(bool, neighbors_list))

    could be simplified to just:

    return sum(neighbors_list)

    Two remarks:
    If you are drawing the result in two colors you could just draw the background colour with one rect covering the whole canvas and then draw black cells if the grid position is positive.
    Lists are not pythons fastest collection. It would need some rewriting but using a dictionary for the grid could speed this up.

    Good luck!

    actually the whole check if a cell is active or not could be reduced to one quarter since there is a twofold symmetry. so just checking it once and then setting all four quarters.

  • @jo Hi jo, thank you so much for the help, I'll try to rewrite by using the dictionary.

    I'm not sure if I got the "one quarter" approach, like how could I count the neighbor numbers?

  • i would leave the center or starting point at (0, 0) and shift the origin with translate(canvas/2, canvas/2). If cell at (n, n) is positive add (n, n), (-n, n), (n, -n), (-n, -n) to the list or dict of active cells. hmmhmh not sure if that makes sense.

    for x in range(cell_amount):
        for y in range(cell_amount):
            if (x, y): #check if cell is active here 
                grid[( x,  y)] == 1
                grid[(-x,  y)] == 1
                grid[( x, -y)] == 1
                grid[(-x, -y)] == 1

    hope that makes sense. good luck!

Log in to reply